I can sum up the Meetup in one line:
People started using the version of Unix that they first started hacking to try to win debate points.From my perspective, this sort of meeting was a marketing nightmare. I think it's very important for the group to have these meetings and these conversations, but we need to think long and hard about how we are going to allow the uber-geeks to debate and rant (which is fun and gets them involved and, hey, even sometimes causes an interesting idea or two to surface) while sheltering the general public (the politicians, the Chamber people, the businesspeople, and the average-joe technology user) from the somewhat aggressive, antogonistic, and anti-social (albeit stereotypical) behavior of the group as a whole. It's in a proper geek's nature to debate and argue and rant, but that's not good for the image... weird balance.
We also need to slant away from the techno-geek focus so that an emerging media artist would feel welcome (i.e. not just involve technologist who likes to talk about technology for technology's sake, but someone who uses technology to create (ex issues. Public Domain, derivative works, digital media rights).
Proper facillitation is also going to be important if meaningful conversation is to be had. Well, wouldn't you know it, I've had formal training in facillitation... Heck, that's what I do for a living. I'm not sure that's a task I'm willing to take on, but maybe next time around some ground rules could be set.
There probably are several types of meetings EFF needs to hold-
Keep up with weekly resources about our rapidly evolving cyborganic relationship with technology. Topics include humanity inside computers, technology culture, digital artifacts, and augmented productivity for 21st century knowledge work.
I won't ever give away your email address. You can always unsubscribe. No hard feelings.